<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Impossibility Triangle in Talent Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ribbonfarm.com/2008/08/17/the-impossibility-triangle-in-talent-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ribbonfarm.com/2008/08/17/the-impossibility-triangle-in-talent-management/</link>
	<description>experiments in refactored perception</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 03:00:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venkat</title>
		<link>http://www.ribbonfarm.com/2008/08/17/the-impossibility-triangle-in-talent-management/#comment-5401</link>
		<dc:creator>Venkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ribbonfarm.com/?p=337#comment-5401</guid>
		<description>I wrote this more than 2 years ago (wow! time flies) and now I find I don&#039;t really understand the post myself. Which must mean there is a fundamental flaw as you suggest. 

In my experience my more solid pieces age well, like good wine, gaining in clarity and depth with each re-reading. I see more depth and insight in them over time, and am struck by how the &quot;younger me&quot; managed to intuit things that I only now understand more explicitly.

This is not one of those pieces.

I&#039;ll have to think more about your refinement though, since I don&#039;t understand that either. Maybe I am just getting slowly dumber overall :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote this more than 2 years ago (wow! time flies) and now I find I don&#8217;t really understand the post myself. Which must mean there is a fundamental flaw as you suggest. </p>
<p>In my experience my more solid pieces age well, like good wine, gaining in clarity and depth with each re-reading. I see more depth and insight in them over time, and am struck by how the &#8220;younger me&#8221; managed to intuit things that I only now understand more explicitly.</p>
<p>This is not one of those pieces.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have to think more about your refinement though, since I don&#8217;t understand that either. Maybe I am just getting slowly dumber overall <img src='http://www.ribbonfarm.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edwin Shao</title>
		<link>http://www.ribbonfarm.com/2008/08/17/the-impossibility-triangle-in-talent-management/#comment-5396</link>
		<dc:creator>Edwin Shao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 00:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ribbonfarm.com/?p=337#comment-5396</guid>
		<description>I think this model is _slightly_ flawed. I think that goal-setting and time-setting are two sides of the same coin. Really, the trade-off for talent management is a spectrum with only two variables:
* Strengths philosophy
* Product philosophy

This is the same dichotomy that exists in the current consulting environment. Do you focus on people management (Good to Great) or product positioning (strategic consulting over the last couple of decades.) I think you&#039;ve covered this in more recent posts.

Now, I do think you&#039;re onto something in breaking product philosophy into goals and time. But think about that old adage: &quot;Good, cheap, fast: pick 2.&quot; This implies that you can also put in a fourth variable: cost. 

I&#039;m sure we can also break talent management down into a variety of variables. The conclusion is that the first tier is bi-variate, and the second tier may be x-variate, depending on your perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this model is _slightly_ flawed. I think that goal-setting and time-setting are two sides of the same coin. Really, the trade-off for talent management is a spectrum with only two variables:<br />
* Strengths philosophy<br />
* Product philosophy</p>
<p>This is the same dichotomy that exists in the current consulting environment. Do you focus on people management (Good to Great) or product positioning (strategic consulting over the last couple of decades.) I think you&#8217;ve covered this in more recent posts.</p>
<p>Now, I do think you&#8217;re onto something in breaking product philosophy into goals and time. But think about that old adage: &#8220;Good, cheap, fast: pick 2.&#8221; This implies that you can also put in a fourth variable: cost. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure we can also break talent management down into a variety of variables. The conclusion is that the first tier is bi-variate, and the second tier may be x-variate, depending on your perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: /var/log/tumbles &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Impossibility Triangle in Talent Management</title>
		<link>http://www.ribbonfarm.com/2008/08/17/the-impossibility-triangle-in-talent-management/#comment-1194</link>
		<dc:creator>/var/log/tumbles &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Impossibility Triangle in Talent Management</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ribbonfarm.com/?p=337#comment-1194</guid>
		<description>[...] The Impossibility Triangle in Talent Management A note on competing uncertainties and objectives in talent management. Just like the rather well known triangle of speed, quality and cost (pick any two) this one relates to goal setting, strengths casting and returns management.   19 August 2008 in Uncategorized &#124; tags: hr, management [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Impossibility Triangle in Talent Management A note on competing uncertainties and objectives in talent management. Just like the rather well known triangle of speed, quality and cost (pick any two) this one relates to goal setting, strengths casting and returns management.   19 August 2008 in Uncategorized | tags: hr, management [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed H. Chi</title>
		<link>http://www.ribbonfarm.com/2008/08/17/the-impossibility-triangle-in-talent-management/#comment-1158</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed H. Chi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 04:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ribbonfarm.com/?p=337#comment-1158</guid>
		<description>Nice post about the challenges of managing people.  I definitely experience some of these issues here at PARC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post about the challenges of managing people.  I definitely experience some of these issues here at PARC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

