Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post

   

Slashdot  Slashdot   digg     del.icio.us   Stumble


Share on Facebook

BBC Documentary Featuring Gregory Chaitin

Date September 15, 2007

For those of you following my series on digital physics (the first part, on the reality of the real line, and the second part on the relevance on cellular automata  have been posted), you will like this documentary on the nature of infinity by BBC. It features Gregory Chaitin, whose work I covered in the first part.

Video on Infinity featuring Chaitin

It is long, but worth it, since it is an unusually sophisticated angle for a popular TV documentary. Serves as a pretty neat introduction to this sort of thinking for those new to it.

If you liked this post, buy me a cappuccino!

3 Responses to “BBC Documentary Featuring Gregory Chaitin”

  1. tubelite said:

    Heh. I chanced upon this video a while back, read the summary and thought, well, let’s hope someone keeps the cutlery away from Chaitin, seeing as how the reward for pushing back the boundaries of math appears to be insanity and/or suicide (Cantor, Godel, Turing).

    Then I read his Omega book - the one you reviewed - and was reassured. Chaitin comes across as a chap bursting with enthusiasm, rather than the somber gravitas more suitable to his station. No one who liberally peppers a math book with exclamation points and sexual motifs is going to use cutlery for anything other than taking up extra large helpings of everything.

  2. Venkat said:

    Gian-Carlo Rota has a great description of the personalities of logicians in ‘Indiscrete thoughts’ (pun intended). The description of Alonzo Church in particular is fantastic — it goes on for a few pages, and includes an extended description of Church’s obsessive compulsive blackboard cleaning ritual and extraordinary precision of speech. The book is on Google Books:

    Indiscrete Thoughts by Gian-Carlo Rota

  3. gamla said:

    The Australian philosopher colin leslie dean argues

    Gödel is a complete failure as he ends in utter meaninglessness. Godels theorems are invalid for 5 reasons: he uses the axiom of reducibility- which is invalid, he uses the axiom of choice, he constructs impredicative statements - which are invalid ,he miss uses the theory of types, he falls into 3 paradoxes

    http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/books/philosophy/GODEL5.pdf

    GODEL’S INCOMPLETENESS THEOREM. ENDS IN ABSURDITY OR MEANINGLESSNESS GODEL IS A COMPLETE FAILURE AS HE ENDS IN UTTER MEANINGLESSNESS CASE STUDY IN THE MEANINGLESSNESS OF ALL VIEWS

    Colin leslie dean also argues that mathematics ends in meaninglessness ie contradiction

    http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/books/philosophy/Absurd_math_science4.pdf

    The absurdities or meaninglessness of mathematics and science: paradoxes
    and contradiction in mathematics and science which makes them meaningless,
    mathematics and science are examples of mythical thought, case study of the
    meaninglessness of all views

    thankfully yours
    gamla

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>